AiHMM logo

Пенитенциарные учреждения Азербайджана

Категории раздела

Отчеты Правозащитного Центра Азербайджана [9]
Отчеты неправительственных организаций Азербайджана [7]
Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций [18]

Форма входа


Главная » Файлы » Отчеты неправительственных организаций

В разделе материалов: 31
Показано материалов: 1-10
Страницы: 1 2 3 4 »

21:24, 26 декабря 2015

Как я писал на блоге, с апреля сего года мы получили доступ в пенитенциарную систему Нагорного Карабаха (Шушинская тюрьма и Следственный изолятор при Полиции НКР). И на днях мы подготовили отчёт, который направили в СМИ, различные международные организации. Решил выставить его на посту, для тех, кому интересная данная тематика, потому что в течение года я всегда освещал ситуацию в тюрьме и СИЗО.

Отчеты неправительственных организаций Азербайджана | Просмотров: 53 | Загрузок: 20 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 07.02.2016

AZERBAIJAN NGO coalition report on the implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 

Reply to the list of issues (CAT/C/AZE/Q/4) of 11 July 2012

Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 36 | Загрузок: 0 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 07.02.2016

Submission to the Committee against Torture in relation to its examination of the fourth periodic Report of Azerbaijan

Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 36 | Загрузок: 0 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 07.02.2016

The Human Tights Watch submission to the UN CAT (October 2015)

Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 37 | Загрузок: 0 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 07.02.2016

Year of publication: 2012

 Final report from a cross-regional conference organised by PRI on torture prevention in June 2012 in Tbilisi, Georgia
The conference aimed to provide opportunities for inter-country learning and exchanging experiences, and to provide recommendations to the authorities in all participating countries for improving the ability of state agencies to prevent torture and ill-treatment in their respective institutions.
The event was attended by experts from the UN SPT, CAT, OHCHR, CoE, CPT, government officials, representatives of national human rights institutions, National Preventive Mechanisms, as well as civil society representatives from Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.
See also: PRI Synthesis Report on Mechanisms for the Prevention of Torture in Nine CIS States, which was launched at the conference.
Download the report:
Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 148 | Загрузок: 135 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 29.01.2013

This report aims to summarise and analyse the trends in the protection from torture in 9 countries of the former USSR. It is based on nine country reports, which assess national legislation, practices and experience of national experts in the field. 

The nine target countries of the former USSR are located in three sub-regions: Eastern Europe (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus), South Caucasus (Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan) and Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan). All target countries were member republics of the USSR and gained (or re-gained) independence in 1991 following the break-up of the Soviet Union. As a result, they inherited the criminal justice system of the former Soviet Union, including penitentiary legislation, administration and infrastructure. This is of particular significance: as the analysis below demonstrates, their common features as post-Soviet states still overweight the differences - including membership in the Council of Europe - between them even 20 years into their independence. 

Over the years of their independence, all target countries have created some form of monitoring mechanism. While during the Soviet era, prosecutors had exercised monitoring, positions of Ombudspersons were created in 1990s or early 2000s, except for Belarus where no Ombudsman exists and Tajikistan where the post of Ombudsman has only recently been established. Entrusted with wide mandates, Ombudspersons, however, hardly had a chance to focus on monitoring of conditions of detention and the prevention of torture. This was a result of either the lack of capacity, or prevalent interest in other matters[1], or of their working environment, including political factors. In most of the target countries democratic institutions and decision-making procedures have yet struggled to function independently and effectively over the last 10 years. Even in those countries with stronger democratic features law enforcement bodies had some opposition to public monitoring and judicial oversight of their activities. In some countries they particularly opposed the creation of monitoring mechanisms involving civil society. Yet, such bodies have ultimately been established in all countries but Tajikistan over the last years. 

However, it is yet to be seen how the creation of National Preventive Mechanisms (hereinafter NPMs) will affect the respective civil society monitoring mechanisms in mid and long term. In Georgia the designation of an NPM has worryingly resulted in the dissolution of the prison monitoring commissions which had consisted of representatives of human rights NGOs. It remains a concern as this model might be followed by other countries, even though the exclusion of monitoring bodies supplementing the NPM does in fact not reflect the spirit and objective of the OPCAT. 

This report seeks to assess, in a comparative perspective, the legislative framework and conditions of detention before focusing on the complaints and monitoring mechanisms across the region with a particular emphasis on the establishment of civil society monitoring mechanisms and National Preventive Mechanisms under the OPCAT.

[1]    For example, the Russian Ombudsman in 1998-2003 was a member of the Communist party and his activities were focused on social rights.

Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 163 | Загрузок: 90 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 29.06.2012

Сводный доклад организации "Международная Тюремная Реформа"
(Перевод с английского)
Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 175 | Загрузок: 118 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 29.06.2012

Azerbaijan chapter of the report on torture prevention in 9 ex-Soviet countries by Penal Reform International:


Applicable legal framework

Places of detention

Areas of concern

Mechanisms of prevention


Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 156 | Загрузок: 78 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 29.06.2012

Часть отчета организации "Международная тюремная реформа" по 9 странам бывшего СССР, касающаяся Азербайджана.



Применимые правовые нормы

Места содержания под стражей

Проблемы, вызывающие озабоченность

Механизмы предотвращения пыток

Выводы и рекомендации

Отчеты международных неправительственных организаций | Просмотров: 166 | Загрузок: 75 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 29.06.2012

English version
Отчеты неправительственных организаций Азербайджана | Просмотров: 165 | Загрузок: 496 | Добавил: Admin | Дата: 28.03.2010


Наш опрос

Оцените мой сайт
Всего ответов: 62

Друзья сайта

  • FIDH
  • OMCT
  • PRI
  • CAT
  • CPT
  • Amnesty International
  • Penitentiary Service
  • Prison Watch - Azerbaijan
  • Статистика

    Онлайн всего: 1
    Гостей: 1
    Пользователей: 0